Quantcast

Have Your Say

1 ... 231232233234235
Topics (4699)
Last Post
no reply to my letter to mr cameron.......... by malka
1 reply,
by jonathan
Sack Dave Hartnett by R Knibbs
0 replies,
by R Knibbs
Competition to decide UK future energy by Dodger47
0 replies,
by Dodger47
Condolences by James Rudd
0 replies,
by James Rudd
Condolences by Andrew Clark
2 replies,
by Keith
Condolences by Andrew Clark
0 replies,
by Andrew Clark
Tax Farce by Rhodes1435
0 replies,
by Rhodes1435
Borrowing money to give to other countries by Frank
0 replies,
by Frank
equality by toni unsworth
0 replies,
by toni unsworth
William Hague by Belinda
1 reply,
by adminukpolitics
Low Income No Help by Rhodes1435
0 replies,
by Rhodes1435
Aid to Pakistani unjustifiable by Mr Lee
2 replies,
by george
winter fuel allowance by adminukpolitics
0 replies,
by adminukpolitics
welfare benefits by adminukpolitics
0 replies,
by adminukpolitics
Motability benefits and use of vehicles by ice cool
3 replies,
by treborc
Have to make cuts by lesley
0 replies,
by lesley
savings in public Spending by Paul Drew
1 reply,
by a biss
CHILD BENEFIT SHOULD BE THERE FOR ALL REGARDLESS OF INCOME ....BUT ONLY FOR FIRST THREE KIDS ...OH AND THE FAMILY TAX IS JUST ANOTHER NAME FOR INCOME SUPPORT ON A LOW INCOME FAMILLY CHURN THE KIDS OUT GET A PART TIME JOB YO ARE LAUGHING ...WHAT HAPPENED TO COMMON SENSE ?? BET THE PEOPLE WHO COULD AFFORD KIDS WOUD CONTINUE TO HAVE THEM WHAT A DROP IN THE PREGGY RATE TOO EH TO THE ONES WHO JUST WANT THE MONEY !! by DEBS
0 replies,
by DEBS
FAMILY CREDIT ANOTHER NAME FOR INCOME SUPPORT ! child benefit shouldl be there for forst three kids and no more , if you can afford more then no child benefit makes sense to me !! by DEBS
0 replies,
by DEBS
Home Reports by Mrs McFarlane
0 replies,
by Mrs McFarlane
1 ... 231232233234235